逢佛殺佛

I am a mathematician. I enjoy stuff like category theory, stable homotopy theory, computations with the Serre spectral sequence, TeXniques to write math notes, lager beers, artificial languages, Japanese philosophy, maps, typography and how to link all these things.

See my CV here. You can email me at **fosco.loregian@gmail.com** (istitutional emails change fast!).

I do lots of things. You can see a more detailed version of my research interests here.

- On the unicity of formal category theories
arXiv:1901.01594 We prove an equivalence between cocomplete Yoneda structures and certain proarrow equipments on a 2-category K. In order to do this, we recognize the presheaf construction of a cocomplete Yoneda structure as a relative, lax idempotent monad sending each admissible 1-cell to an adjunction. Each cocomplete Yoneda structure on K arises in this way from a relative lax idempotent monad “with enough adjoint 1-cells”, whose domain generates the ideal of admissibles, and the Kleisli category of such a monad equips its domain with proarrows. We call these structures “yosegi”. Quite often, the presheaf construction associated to a yosegi generates an ambidextrous Yoneda structure; in such a setting there exists a fully formal version of Isbell duality.

- Categorical notions of fibration
arXiv:1806.06129 Fibrations over a category $B$, introduced to category theory by Grothendieck, encode pseudo-functors $B^\text{op} \rightsquigarrow {\bf Cat}$, while the special case of discrete fibrations encode presheaves $B^\text{op} \to {\bf Set}$. A two-sided discrete variation encodes functors $B^\text{op} \times A \to {\bf Set}$, which are also known as profunctors from $A$ to $B$. By work of Street, all of these fibration notions can be defined internally to an arbitrary 2-category or bicategory. While the two-sided discrete fibrations model profunctors internally to ${\bf Cat}$, unexpectedly, the dual two-sided codiscrete cofibrations are necessary to model ${\mathcal V}$-profunctors internally to ${\mathcal V}$-${\bf Cat}$.

- Accessibility and presentability in 2-categories
arXiv:1804.08710 We outline a definition of accessible and presentable objects in a 2-category endowed with a Yoneda structure, this perspective suggests a unified treatment of many “Gabriel-Ulmer like” theorems (like the classical Gabriel-Ulmer representation for locally presentable categories, Giraud theorem, Gabriel-Popescu theorem, etc.), asserting how presentable objects arise as reflections of “generating” ones. In a Yoneda structure, whose underlying “presheaf construction” is $\bf P$, two non-equivalent definitions of presentability for $A\in\mathcal{K}$ can be given: in the weakest, it is generally false that all presheaf objects are presentable, this leads to the definition of a Gabriel-Ulmer structure, i.e. a Yoneda structure rich enough to concoct Gabriel-Ulmer duality and to make this asimmetry disappear. We end the paper with a roundup of examples, involving classical (set-based and enriched) and low- as well as higher-dimensional category theory.

- Localization theory for derivators
arXiv:1802.08193 We outline the theory of reflections for prederivators, derivators and stable derivators. In order to parallel the classical theory valid for categories, we outline how reflections can be equivalently described as categories of fractions, reflective factorization systems, and categories of algebras for idempotent monads. This is a further development of the theory of monads and factorization systems for derivators.

- Factorization systems on (stable) derivators
arXiv:1705.08565 We define triangulated factorization systems on a given triangulated category, and prove that a suitable subclass thereof (the normal triangulated torsion theories) corresponds bijectively to t-structures on the same category. This result is then placed in the framework of derivators regarding a triangulated category as the underlying category of a stable derivator. More generally, we define derivator factorization systems in the 2-category $\mathbf{PDer}$, also formally describing them as algebras for a suitable strict 2-monad (this result is of independent interest), and prove that a similar characterization still holds true: for a stable derivator $\mathbb{D}$, a suitable class of derivator factorization systems (the normal derivator torsion theories) correspond bijectively with t-structures on the underlying category $\mathbb{D}(e)$ of the derivator. These two result can be regarded as the triangulated- and derivator- analogues, respectively, of the theorem that says that `t-structures are normal torsion theories’ in the setting of stable ∞-categories, showing how the result remains true whatever the chosen model for stable homotopy theory is.

- Homotopical algebra is not concrete
arXiv:1704.00303 We generalize Freyd’s well-known result that “homotopy is not concrete” offering a general method to show that under certain assumptions on a model category $\mathcal{M}$, its homotopy category ho($\mathcal{M}$) cannot be concrete with respect to the universe where $\mathcal{M}$ is assumed to be locally small. This result is part of an attempt to understand more deeply the relation between (some parts of) set theory and (some parts of) abstract homotopy theory.

The paper has been accepted for publication on JHRS.

- t-structures in stable $\infty$-categories
[PDF] This is the thesis collecting the three works below.

- Recollements in stable $\infty$-categories
[PDF] This is the third joint work with D. Fiorenza, about $t$-structures in stable $\infty$-categories, which studies recollements. We develop the theory of recollements in a stable $\infty$-categorical setting. In the axiomatization of Beilinson, Bernstein and Deligne, recollement situations provide a generalization of Grothendieck’s “six functors” between derived categories. The adjointness relations between functors in a recollement induce a “recollee” $t$-structure on $\mathcal{D}$, given $t$-structures $t_0$, $t_1$ on $\mathcal{D}_0$, $\mathcal{D}_1$. Such a classical result, well known in the setting of triangulated categories, acquires a new taste when $t$-structure are described as suitable ($\infty$-categorical) factorization systems: the corresponding factorization system enjoys a number of interesting formal properties and unexpected autodualities. In the geometric case of a stratified space, various recollements arise, which “interact well” with the combinatorics of the intersections of strata to give a well-defined, associative operation. From this we deduce a generalized associative property for $n$-fold gluings, valid in any stable $\infty$-category.

- Hearts and Towers in stable $\infty$-categories
This is the second joint work with D. Fiorenza, about $t$-structures in stable $\infty$-categories, which shows that in the $\infty$-categorical setting semiorthogonal decompositions on a stable $\infty$-category $\mathcal{C}$ arise decomposing morphisms in the

*Postnikov tower*induced by a chain of $t$-structures, regarded (thanks to our previous work) as multiple factorization systems on $\mathcal{C}$.A slightly unexpected result is that $t$-structures having stable classes, i.e. such that both classes are stable $\infty$-subcategories of $\mathcal{C}$, are precisely the

*fixed points*for the natural action of $\mathbb Z$ on the set of $t$-structures, given by the shift endofunctor.- This is the (co)end, my only (co)friend
[PDF] A short note about coend calculus. Co/ends are awesome, once you try to use them, your mathematical life changes forever. I put a considerable effort in making the arguments and constructions rather explicit: even if at some point I decided to come up with an arXiv-ed version, this document must be thought as a never-ending accumulation of examples, constructions and techniques which are better understood by means of co/ends. Feel free to give advices on how to improve the discussion!

- $t$-structures are normal torsion theories
[PDF] My first joint work with D. Fiorenza, laying the foundations of the theory of $t$-structures in stable $\infty$-categories under the unifying notion of a “normal torsion theory”: as you can see in the abstract, we characterize $t$-structures in stable $\infty$-categories as suitable quasicategorical factorization systems. More precisely we show that a $t$-structure on a stable $\infty$-category $\mathcal{C}$ is equivalent to a normal torsion theory $\mathbb{F}$ on $\mathcal{C}$, i.e. to a factorization system $(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{M})$ where both classes satisfy the 3-for-2 cancellation property, and a certain compatibility with pullbacks/pushouts.

The paper has been published in

Fiorenza, Domenico, and Fosco Loregiàn. “t-structures are normal torsion theories.” Applied Categorical Structures 24.2 (2016): 181-208.

- A course on 2-categories
A course on 2-category theory (hopefully) held in Padua; there will be notes (hopefully), and beer afterwards.

- Formal category theory
A reading seminar at Masaryk University; each other Wednesday (but the first lecture is on Monday, October 9) from 2pm to 4pm. There will be cookies -and notes-!

The scope of these lectures is to breach in Riehl-Verity’s theory of $\infty$-cosmoi. After a few classical readings

- Street, Ross, and Robert Walters. “Yoneda structures on 2-categories.” Journal of Algebra 50.2 (1978): 350-379.
- Street, Ross. “Fibrations in bicategories.” Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques 21.2 (1980): 111-160.
- Street, Ross. “Conspectus of variable categories.” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 21.3 (1981): 307-338.
- Street, Ross. “Fibrations and Yoneda’s lemma in a 2-category.” Category seminar. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 1974.
- Wood, Richard J. “Abstract pro arrows I.” Cahiers de topologie et géometrie différentielle categoriques 23.3 (1982): 279-290.
- Wood, R. J. “Proarrows II.” Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques 26.2 (1985): 135-168.
- Rosebrugh, Robert, and R. J. Wood. “Proarrows and cofibrations.” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 53.3 (1988): 271-296.

we embark in the study of RV theory:

- Riehl, Emily, and Dominic Verity. “Infinity category theory from scratch.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.05314 (2016). refcards here
- Riehl, Emily, and Dominic Verity. “The 2-category theory of quasi-categories.” Advances in Mathematics 280 (2015): 549-642.
- Riehl, Emily, and Dominic Verity. “Homotopy coherent adjunctions and the formal theory of monads.” Advances in Mathematics 286 (2016): 802-888.
- Riehl, Emily, and Dominic Verity. “Completeness results for quasi-categories of algebras, homotopy limits, and related general constructions.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.6247 (2014).
- Riehl, Emily, and Dominic Verity. “Fibrations and Yoneda’s lemma in an $\infty$-cosmos.” Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 221.3 (2017): 499-564.
- Riehl, Emily, and Dominic Verity. “Kan extensions and the calculus of modules for$\infty$-categories.” Algebraic & Geometric Topology 17.1 (2017): 189-271.
- Riehl, Emily, and Michael Shulman. “A type theory for synthetic $\infty$-categories.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07442 (2017).
- Riehl, Emily, and Dominic Verity. “The comprehension construction.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.10023 (2017).

- Homotopy Type Theory
A reading seminar at Masaryk University; each other Wednesday (first lecture October 11) from 2pm to 4pm. There will be cookies!

- Exercises in Category theory (IT)
[PDF] A few exercises in Category Theory. Last version October 2017.

- Categorical Tools
I started another project (similar to the Jacobians mathematicians) called

**Categorical Tools**, where I tried to propose a bit of categorical language to the “heathens”, and in order to introduce the youngsters here in math@unipd to the “classical” constructions any functorial gung-ho must meet at least once in a lifetime (bits of enriched category theory, toposes, spectral sequences, homotopy theory, weighted limits, coend-juggling, higher category theory…).- Jacobian Mathematicians
Our name is a pun between Jacobian and Jacobins; it is intended to be some kind of

*open window*towards the scientific attitude to knowledge. We talk about Maths, also developing its interconnection with culture and Philosophy.I gave seven lectures until now (but three more people talked about Game Theory, Fourier analysis, and analytical solutions to PDEs):

- [PDF] Fibrations between spheres and Hopf theorem
- [PDF] The importance of being abstract aka A gentle introduction to the categorical point of view to reality;
- [PDF] low dimensional Topological Quantum Field Theories;
- [PDF] Chatting about complex geometry (from symplectic to Kahler manifolds);
- [PDF] Connections and Fiber Bundles, with a glance to the geometry of Classical Field Theory;
- [PDF]: A short lecure about Computational Homological Algebra, my first piece of (!) applied Mathematics.
- [PDF] [indeed, yet to come]: Monoidal Categories for the working physicist, a tentative introduction to Categorical approach to Quantum Mechanics.

- PSSL 103
Masaryk University will host the 103rd edition of PSSL. We look forward to see you in Brno! all the relevant informations are on the conference website.

- Kan Extension Seminar
From January to June 2014 I’ve been a proud member of the Kan extension seminar. I wrote about Freyd and Kelly’s paper “Categories of continuous functors, I”, a copy of which you can find here. This experience culminated with the participation to an informal series of short seminars at the Winstanley Lecture Theatre in Trinity College, right before the beginning of the 2014 International Category Theory Conference.

- COG-GOC 2013
[PDF] This is the first experiment of a meeting I organized with some friends and colleagues (M. Porta, A. Gagna, G. Mossa and many others) in order to get updated (and “enriched” –pun intended) about their research and interests. M. Porta patiently introduced me to the arcane misteries of bits of “higher” language, exposing me to little pieces of his thesis and of the collective seminar

*Autour de DAG*.

As for its philosophical side,**GoC-CoG**can be defined as an*experimental window open to autonomous research*, where the word “research” has to be understood in etymological sense: the daily struggle of a bunch of curious minds towards Gnosis, the firm determination to avoid the fragmented, edonistic tendency of a certain modern mathematical practice, which concentrates collective efforts on solving a particular instance of a problem instead of*building a theory*eroding our questions millennium after millennium.

(*Someday you will also see the videos of our “conferences”…*)

- REFCARDS - Formal category theory
[pdf] A talk at ULB about an almost finished preprint with I. Di Liberti.

- REFCARDS - Formal category theory
[html] A brief slideshow about what I’m doing as a guest at MPI. The file was written using emacs and org-reveal

- REFCARDS - Kan extensions
[PDF] A brief cheatsheet on Kan extensions, written for TiCT.

- REFCARDS - Monoidal and enriched derivators
[PDF] A brief cheatsheet on enriched derivators and the {0,1,2}-Grothendieck construction.

- Categorical Groups
[PDF] Categorical groups (or “strict 2-groups”) arise, like many other notions, as a categorification. They appear in a number of forms: as “fully dualizable” strict monoidal categories, internal categories in $\mathbf{Grp}$, internal groups in $\mathbf{Cat}$, crossed modules, strict 2-groupoids with a single object…

This variety of incarnations gives a very rich theory which can be built by the power of analogy with the set-theoretic case: my exposition will concentrate mostly on two sides of the story:- arXiv:0407463 As set-theoretic groups can be linearly represented on vectors spaces, so 2-groups can be 2-linearly represented on 2-vector spaces, thanks to a construction by Voevodsky and Kapranov; the category 2-$\mathbf{Vect}$ carries an astoundingly rich structure, and so does the category of representations Fun($\mathbf{G}$, 2-$\mathbf{Vect}$).
- arXiv:0801.3843 As (suitably tame) topological groups give Cech theory of principal G-bundles, so 2-groups give Cech theory of principal 2-bundles; Cech cocycles can be characterized, thanks to an idea by G. Segal, as suitable functors, allowing to recover a categorified Cech theory of “2-bundles”.

- Moerdijk & Ara talks
Notes of two seminars held in

*Paris 7*on June 17-18, 2013: I. Moerdijk spoke about*Dendroidal sets and test categories*, and a handwritten copy of the notes is here. D. Ara spoke about*Foncteurs lax normalisés entre n-catégories strictes*: here you can find a handwritten copy of the notes. Both have been written by F. Genovese, which I warmly thank. Maybe in the future I could merge Francesco’s notes with mine and them.- Homotopical interpretation of stack theory
[PDF] In their paper “

*Strong stacks and classifying spaces*” A. Joyal and M. Tierney provide an internal characterization of the classical (or ‘‘folk’’) model structure on the category of groupoids in a Grothendieck topos*E*. The fibrant objects in the classical model structure on $\mathbf{Gpd}(\mathcal{E})$ are called ‘‘strong stacks’’, as they appear as a strengthening of the notion of stack in $\mathcal{E}$ (i.e. an internal groupoid object in $\mathcal{E}$ subject to a certain condition which involves ‘‘descent data’’). The main application is when $\mathcal{E}$ is the topos of simplicial sheaves on a space or on a site: in that case then strong stacks are intimately connected with classifying spaces of simplicial groups.Adapting the presentation to the audience needed a ‘‘gentle introduction’’ to Topos Theory and the internalization philosophy of Category Theory, and a more neat presentation of the folk model structure on $\mathbf{Gpd}(\mathbf{Set})$ (not to mention the original article by Joyal and Tierney was

*utterly*hard-to-read, so I tried to fill some holes and unraveled some prerequisites).- Categorification on AQFT
[PDF] Classical AQFT can be defined as a cosheaf $\mathcal{A}$ of $\mathrm{C}^\ast$-algebras on the manifold of space-time (or more generally, on a suitable lorentzian manifold playing such rôle)

*M*, satisfying two axioms:**locality**, ensuring that observables in an open region are*a fortiori*observables in any superset of that region, and**causality**, ensuring that If $U,V$ are spacelike separated regions, then $\mathcal A(U)$ and $\mathcal A(V)$ pairwise commute as subalgebras of $\mathcal A(M)$.Now what if we want to suitably

*categorify*this notion, extending it to the realm of tensor categories (that is, categories equipped with a tensor functor subject to suitable axioms)? Causality has to be replaced by a higher-categorical analogue of the concept of commutators of a subalgebra of $\mathcal{B}(\mathbb H)$ and Von Neumann algebras, leading to the definition of a*Von Neumann category*as a subcategory of $\mathbf{Hilb}_{\mathbb H}$ which equals its double commutant.- Homotopical Algebra for $\mathrm{C}^\ast$-algebras
[PDF] Homotopical Algebra showed to be extremely fruitful in studying categories of “things that resemble spaces” and structured spaces, keeping track of their structure in the step-by-step construction of abstract homotopy invariants; so in a certain sense it is natural to apply this complicated machinery to the category $\mathrm{C}^\ast\text{-}\mathbf{Alg}$: all in all, Gel’fand-Naimark’s theorem tells that there exists an equivalence

Starting from this we shouldn’t be surprised by the existence of homotopical methods in $\mathrm{C}^\ast$-algebra theory, and it should be natural to spend a considerable effort to endow $\mathrm{C}^\ast\text{-}\mathbf{Alg}$ with a model structure, maybe exploiting one of the various pre-existing model structures on $\mathbf{Top}$: this is (almost) what [Uuye] proposed in his article.

The main problem is that the category of $\mathrm{C}^\ast$-algebras admits a homotopical calculus which can’t be extended to a full model structure in the sense of [Quillen]. This is precisely Theorem 5.2, which we take from [Uuye], who repeats an unpublished argument by Andersen and Grodal; the plan to overcome this difficulty is to seek for a weaker form of Homotopical Calculus, still fitting our needs. To this end, the main reference is [Brown]’s thesis, which laid the foundations of this weaker abstract Homotopy Theory, based on the notion of “category with fibrant objects”. Instead of looking for a full model structure on $\mathrm{C}^\ast\text{-}\mathbf{Alg}$ we seek for a fibrant one, exploiting the track drawn by [Uuye]’s paper, which is the main reference of the talk together with [Brown]’s thesis.

- My (graduate) thesis
[PDF] Orlov spent lots of years studying the derived category $\mathbf{D}^b_\text{coh}(X)$ of coherent sheaves on a variety $X$; in the spirit of reconstruction theory, lots of algebraic properties of the category itself reflect into geometric properties of the space $X$.

- Functorial topology
The first reason I chose to study Mathematics is Algebraic Topology. Despite the intrinsic complexity of the topic, I can’t abandon the idea that this is the most elegant (=abstract) way to look at Geometry, so with the passing of time I cared to refine my understanding about homotopy theory, homological algebra and suchlike, accepting that the main reason Category Theory was invented is to turn Algebraic Topologist’s

*deliria*into rigorous statements. The “tentative complements” arose with two short-term goals, but rapidly fell off to become the draft of a draft: 1) explicitly solve some exercises nobody publicly solves (they’re often left to the*conscious reader*, but mathematicians are often lazy people) and 2) give a categorical flavour even to basic statements on both General and basic Algebraic Topology. The “short intro” arose to extend and publicly propose one of the cornerstones in advanced Homological Algebra: triangulated categories- Galois theory notes
[PDF] One of the most beautiful pieces of Abstract Algebra discovered by mankind. It is indeed one of the subtlest incarnation of the mathematical notion of

*duality*between two entities. Whenever we are interested in studying the (partially ordered) set of intermediate structure between a top-set*E*and a bottom-set*F*, we can turn to study Aut(*E*|*F*), the group of automorphisms of the top-set, fixing pointwise the bottom-set- Hamiltonian Mech
[PDF] My first love is

**Mathematical Physics**, I cannot hide it. In writing these poor and chaotic pages I wanted to give myself some sort of*glossa*about basic mathematical methods used in Physics; in fact there’s neither something original, nor something new in them, and I should have hidden them to your eyes if I had wanted to avoid a bad impression. But I definitely fell in love with Wheeler’s idea that “Physics is [a part of] Geometry”, and I’m fascinated by the ill genius of A. Fomenko, so I can’t quit my quixotic quest for a rigorous foundation of Mathematical Physics…

subscribe via RSS

Kotlářská 2

611 37 Brno (CZ)

✉: fosco.loregian@gmail.com

✉: loregianf@math.muni.cz